Neo4j logo
Neo4j
Create
Home
Feedback
AuraDB
78
Changelog

    Boards

  • New Console

  • Aura General

  • Questions and General feedback

  • AuraDS

  • Data-Importer

  • AuraDB

  • Drivers

  • GraphQL

  • Ops Manager

  • Explore/Bloom

  • Query

  • Browser

  • Dashboards

  • Desktop

  • Desktop v2

  • AuraDB Regions

  • Arrows

  • Graph Intelligence for Fabric

  • Workspace

  • Agents

  • Fleet Manager

  • Aura Graph Analytics

Powered by Canny

AuraDB

posts
Split Compute and storage costs?
I have an exercise I'm considering (an enhanced MusicBrainz Neo4j db). I want to avoid having to manage the database, but I envisage my model will have a lot of nodes and edges, periodic updates, but I don't anticipate actually running that many queries and those that I do run will not be very involved. Are there any plans to split the compute vs storage costs for the managed service the way that Snowflake does? The combined model I'm seeing at the moment actually makes it more attractive to use AWS, at least from a cost point of view. Thx, Jack
·
in progress
Powered by Canny